In effectSB 243 (2025); amended by SB 1119 and SB 867 (2026)California
California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) for Financial Services
How California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) applies to financial services organizations and the obligations to plan for.
Effective
January 1, 2026
Max penalty
Not specified
Applies to
deployer
Why this law matters for financial services
Banks, lenders, insurers, broker-dealers, and fintech firms using AI for credit decisions, underwriting, fraud detection, and consumer interaction.
This law applies to financial services organizations to the extent their AI use falls within the law's scope (see the obligations below). Organizations operating in California should treat this law as part of the baseline regulatory obligations alongside any sector-specific federal rules.
Key obligations
disclosure→ deployerCal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22602(a), 22604
Issue a clear and conspicuous notification that a companion chatbot is artificially generated and not human whenever a reasonable person would be misled into believing they are interacting with a human, and disclose that companion chatbots may not be suitable for some minors.
Deadline: At interaction
governance→ deployerCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22602(b)
Maintain, and publish details of, a protocol that prevents a companion chatbot from producing suicidal ideation, suicide, or self-harm content, including referral to crisis service providers when a user expresses suicidal ideation or self-harm.
Deadline: Ongoing
documentation→ deployerCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22603
Beginning July 1, 2027, report annually to the Office of Suicide Prevention the number of crisis-service referral notifications issued in the prior calendar year and the protocols used to detect, remove, and respond to suicidal ideation, without user identifiers.
Deadline: From July 1, 2027
Recommended next steps
Inventory AI systems used in financial services workflows that may fall within California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots)'s scope.
Map each system against the obligations above and identify the responsible role (developer vs deployer).
Adopt a structured framework — see NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 — to demonstrate due care and produce audit-ready evidence.
Document obligations satisfied and gaps in a single register, refreshed at the cadence required by the law (typically annual).
Frequently asked questions
Does California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) apply to financial services organizations?
This law applies to financial services organizations to the extent their AI use falls within the law's scope (see the obligations below). The law should be read with the source-derived obligations listed on this page and any sector-specific federal rules that apply to financial services workflows.
When does California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) take effect for financial services use cases?
California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) has been effective since January 1, 2026.
Who carries the compliance duty for California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) in financial services?
California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) lists deployer as the role coverage for California. The actual duty depends on whether the organization develops, deploys, procures, or uses the covered AI system in the law's scope.
What penalty exposure should financial services teams track?
California SB 243 (Companion Chatbots) does not list a fixed maximum penalty in the Atlas record; remedies follow the law's enforcement framework and source sections.
We may receive referral commissions from recommended compliance tools. Recommendations are based on product fit and not on commission size. Links marked “partner link” include a tracked redirect.