Updated daily · Cited primary sources only
The structured reference for US AI compliance.
NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, and every consequential US state AI law in one continuously verified atlas — paired with interactive tools that map obligations to your operations.
Built for compliance officerslegal counselAI product teams
Atlas snapshotv.2026.07.27
US state AI law status — at a glance
ME
WA
VT
NH
OR
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
NV
WY
SD
IA
IL
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
RI
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
AK
TX
FL
HI
In effectEffective soonEnacted, pendingActive monitoring
12laws
Tracked across jurisdictions
2frameworks
NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001
48obligations
Mapped to primary sources
Jul 27
Last verified by monitor
Currently in effect
What's enforceable right now
Snapshot from the freshness monitor. Click any law for full obligations, penalties, and citations.
| Jurisdiction | Law | Status | Effective | Max penalty | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | Colorado Artificial Intelligence ActC.R.S. § 6-1-1701 to § 6-1-1709 | Effective soon | January 1, 2027 | $20K | June 17, 2026 |
| Connecticut | Connecticut Public Act 26-15 / SB 5 (Online Safety and AI Provisions)Public Act 26-15, 2026 Gen. Assemb. (Substitute S.B. 5, "An Act Concerning Online Safety"), as affected by Public Act 26-100 | Effective soon | October 1, 2026 | Not specified | July 27, 2026 |
| California | California AI Transparency ActCal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22757 et seq. | Effective soon | August 2, 2026 | $5K | July 14, 2026 |
| California | California Generative AI: Training Data TransparencyCal. Civ. Code §§ 3110–3111 | In effect | January 1, 2026 | Not specified | July 27, 2026 |
| California | Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (TFAIA)Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22757.10–22757.16; Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1107–1107.2; Cal. Gov. Code § 11546.8 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 138) | In effect | January 1, 2026 | $1.0M | July 27, 2026 |
| Illinois | Illinois HB 3773 (AI in Employment Decisions)775 ILCS 5/2-102 (as amended) | In effect | January 1, 2026 | Not specified | July 24, 2026 |
| Texas | Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA)Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Chs. 551-554 | In effect | January 1, 2026 | $200K | July 24, 2026 |
| Utah | Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy ActUtah Code Title 13, Chapters 77, 72, and 72a | In effect | May 7, 2025 | $5K | July 27, 2026 |
Interactive
Tools that turn law into action
Built on the same primary-source data that powers the atlas. Free, no account required.
10-question diagnostic
Compliance Checker
Surface every framework and state law that applies to your AI deployments — including likely effective dates.
Question 4 of 10Does the AI system make consequential decisions about a person's employment, credit, housing, or insurance?
- Yes — directly affects outcomes
- Yes — but a human reviews each decision
- No — informational only
Open tool
Maximum theoretical exposure
Penalty Calculator
Estimate worst-case civil penalties across applicable jurisdictions. Conservative methodology, fully cited.
Colorado AI Act (per violation)$20,000
NYC LL 144 (per day, per tool)$1,500
Texas TRAIGA$200,000
Cure period adjustment−$45,000
Estimated max$612,500
Open tool
Jurisdiction-tailored template
Impact Assessment Generator
Produces a downloadable impact assessment template aligned with your jurisdiction's statutory requirements.
Open tool
Find your starting point
Four ways into the atlas
Same primary sources, different lenses. Pick the one that matches how you're scoping work this quarter.
By framework
Maturity & control programs you may already use.
By industry
Where AI use intersects existing sectoral law.
By role
Obligations differ for builders, buyers, and resellers.
By comparison
Side-by-side views for overlapping AI laws and frameworks.
Freshness monitor
Recent updates
Every entry links to the primary source. We re-verify continuously and timestamp every page.
- June 2, 2026DelayIllinois IDHR Temporarily Postpones AI Employment Notice RulemakingThe Illinois Department of Human Rights announced on June 2, 2026 that the June 10 public hearing for proposed administrative rules implementing the Artificial Intelligence in Employment provisions of the Illinois Human Rights Act was temporarily postponed. IDHR said it is reviewing matters related to the proposed rulemaking and will provide updated next steps. The underlying Public Act 103-0804 requirements remain effective January 1, 2026; the detailed notice timing, means, and conditions rules remain pending.
- May 14, 2026AmendmentColorado Repeals and Reenacts Its AI Act as SB 26-189 (ADMT Framework)On May 14, 2026, Governor Jared Polis signed Senate Bill 26-189 (Chapter 131 of the 2026 Session Laws), which repeals and reenacts the Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act as a narrower automated decision-making technology (ADMT) regime in part 17 of article 1 of title 6, C.R.S. (§ 6-1-1701 to § 6-1-1709), effective January 1, 2027. The reenacted law drops SB 24-205's standalone duty of care, algorithmic impact assessments, and risk-management-program mandates. It centers on developer documentation duties (§ 6-1-1702), a deployer point-of-interaction notice and a 30-day post-adverse-outcome disclosure (§ 6-1-1704), and consumer rights to correct inaccurate personal data and obtain meaningful human review and reconsideration (§ 6-1-1705). The Attorney General enforces the law exclusively as a deceptive trade practice under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, with a 60-day right to cure and no new private right of action; routine activities such as advertising, content moderation, cybersecurity, fraud prevention, and anti-money-laundering and sanctions compliance are excluded from the definition of a consequential decision.
- April 27, 2026LitigationFederal Court Stays Enforcement of Colorado's AI ActOn April 27, 2026, Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado stayed enforcement of the Colorado AI Act in X. AI LLC v. Weiser, No. 1:26-cv-01515. xAI had filed suit on April 9, 2026 raising First Amendment compelled-speech, Dormant Commerce Clause, due-process vagueness, and equal-protection claims, and the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint in intervention against the Act on April 24, 2026 — the first federal intervention in a state AI-law challenge. The stipulated order bars the Colorado Attorney General from initiating any investigation or enforcement of SB 24-205 (or legislation replacing or amending it) until 14 days after the court rules on xAI's forthcoming motion for a preliminary injunction. The Attorney General has stated it will not promulgate implementing rules or enforce the Act until the rulemaking process concludes.
- January 1, 2026EffectiveTexas TRAIGA Takes Effect January 1, 2026The enrolled text of House Bill 149 states that TRAIGA takes effect January 1, 2026. The Act creates Texas Business and Commerce Code Chapters 551 through 554, with Texas Attorney General enforcement, a notice-and-cure process, tiered civil penalties, a complaint mechanism, a regulatory sandbox, and the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council.
- January 1, 2026EffectiveCalifornia AB 2013 and SB 53 Reach January 1, 2026 Compliance DateOn January 1, 2026, California AB 2013's first training-data documentation deadline and SB 53's frontier-AI transparency provisions became current compliance items. The California AI Transparency Act created by SB 942 did not become operative on January 1, 2026; AB 853 amended Business and Professions Code § 22757.6 so Chapter 25 becomes operative August 2, 2026, with large-online-platform and GenAI-hosting-platform duties beginning January 1, 2027 and capture-device-manufacturer duties beginning January 1, 2028.
The compliance digest, weekly.
New laws, rulemaking, enforcement actions, and framework updates — distilled to a 4-minute read every Tuesday.
Free · Unsubscribe anytime · No tracking pixels