AAI Compliance Atlas
FrameworksState lawsIndustriesToolsNews
GuidesMap my obligations →
AAI Compliance Atlas

Structured, continuously verified reference for US AI compliance — federal frameworks, state laws, and the obligations that connect them.

Atlas

  • Frameworks
  • State laws
  • Industries
  • By role
  • Comparisons

Tools

  • Compliance Checker
  • Penalty Calculator
  • Impact Assessment
  • Vendor Questionnaire

Resources

  • Guides
  • News
  • Blog
  • Methodology

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
© 2026 AI Compliance Atlas. Informational only — not legal advice. Consult qualified counsel before making compliance decisions.Verified Jul 28, 2026
  1. Home/
  2. Industries/
  3. Financial Services/
  4. Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA)
In effectHB 149Texas

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) for Financial Services

How Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) applies to financial services organizations and the obligations to plan for.

Effective
January 1, 2026
Max penalty
$200K
Applies to
developer + deployer

Why this law matters for financial services

Banks, lenders, insurers, broker-dealers, and fintech firms using AI for credit decisions, underwriting, fraud detection, and consumer interaction.

This law applies to financial services organizations to the extent their AI use falls within the law's scope (see the obligations below). Organizations operating in Texas should treat this law as part of the baseline regulatory obligations alongside any sector-specific federal rules.

Key obligations

  • disclosure→ deployerTex. Bus. & Com. Code § 552.051

    Provide clear and conspicuous disclosure to consumers when they are interacting with an AI system in a manner where a reasonable consumer might believe they are interacting with a human.

    Deadline: at_interaction

  • governance→ developerTex. Bus. & Com. Code § 552.056

    Refrain from developing or deploying AI systems with the intent to engage in unlawful discrimination against protected classes under Texas or federal law.

    Deadline: ongoing

  • governance→ bothTex. Bus. & Com. Code § 552.104, § 552.105

    On receipt of a written notice of alleged violation from the Texas Attorney General, cure the violation within the statutory cure window to avoid tier-1 civil penalties of $10,000–$12,000; uncurable violations and continuing violations escalate to $80,000–$200,000 per violation and $2,000–$40,000 per day under § 552.105.

    Deadline: on_ag_notice

  • governance→ deployerTex. Bus. & Com. Code § 552.106

    Licensed, registered, or certified persons remain separately subject to discipline by their Texas licensing authority, including sanctions of up to $100,000, in addition to civil penalties imposed by the Attorney General under § 552.105.

    Deadline: ongoing

Recommended next steps

  1. Inventory AI systems used in financial services workflows that may fall within Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA)'s scope.
  2. Map each system against the obligations above and identify the responsible role (developer vs deployer).
  3. Adopt a structured framework — see NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 — to demonstrate due care and produce audit-ready evidence.
  4. Document obligations satisfied and gaps in a single register, refreshed at the cadence required by the law (typically annual).

Frequently asked questions

Does Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) apply to financial services organizations?

This law applies to financial services organizations to the extent their AI use falls within the law's scope (see the obligations below). The law should be read with the source-derived obligations listed on this page and any sector-specific federal rules that apply to financial services workflows.

When does Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) take effect for financial services use cases?

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) has been effective since January 1, 2026.

Who carries the compliance duty for Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) in financial services?

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) lists developer, deployer as the role coverage for Texas. The actual duty depends on whether the organization develops, deploys, procures, or uses the covered AI system in the law's scope.

What penalty exposure should financial services teams track?

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) lists a maximum penalty of $200K in the Atlas record. Penalty exposure depends on the source section, violation type, and factual context.

Automate AI governance with OneTrust

partner link

Manage AI inventory, risk assessments, and policy enforcement across your organization. Used by hundreds of regulated enterprises.

See OneTrust AI Governance →
Related
  • Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) — full law detail
  • All AI laws applicable to financial services
  • All AI laws in Texas
Legal disclaimer

This content is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change frequently and vary by jurisdiction. Consult qualified legal counsel before making compliance decisions. Information accuracy not guaranteed as of any specific date.

We may receive referral commissions from recommended compliance tools. Recommendations are based on product fit and not on commission size. Links marked “partner link” include a tracked redirect.