Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act vs California AI Transparency Act
Side-by-side comparison covering scope, obligations, penalties, and where they overlap.
| Attribute | Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act | California AI Transparency Act |
|---|---|---|
| Type | State / Federal Law | State / Federal Law |
| Authority | utah (SB 149 (2024); amended by SB 226, HB 452, SB 332 (2025)) | california (SB 942 (2024)) |
| Effective date | May 1, 2024 | January 1, 2026 |
| Max penalty | $5K | $5K |
| Applies to | deployer, vendor | developer |
Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act
The Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (UAIPA), enacted as SB 149 in March 2024, was the first comprehensive U.S. state generative-AI consumer-protection statute. The 2025 Utah General Assembly substantially narrowed it through SB 226 and added a separate mental-health-chatbot regime through HB 452 — both effective **May 7, 2025**. SB 332 also extended the UAIPA repeal date from May 1, 2025 t…
California AI Transparency Act
The California AI Transparency Act (SB 942) requires "covered providers" — entities that create, code, or otherwise produce a generative AI system with over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users that is publicly accessible within California — to provide tools for users to detect AI-generated content and to apply latent disclosures to content their systems produce. Codified at Business and Profession…
We may receive referral commissions from recommended compliance tools. Recommendations are based on product fit and not on commission size. Links marked “partner link” include a tracked redirect.