AAI Compliance Atlas
FrameworksState lawsIndustriesToolsNews
GuidesMap my obligations →
AAI Compliance Atlas

Structured, continuously verified reference for US AI compliance — federal frameworks, state laws, and the obligations that connect them.

Atlas

  • Frameworks
  • State laws
  • Industries
  • By role
  • Comparisons

Tools

  • Compliance Checker
  • Penalty Calculator
  • Impact Assessment
  • Vendor Questionnaire

Resources

  • Guides
  • News
  • Blog
  • Methodology

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
© 2026 AI Compliance Atlas. Informational only — not legal advice. Consult qualified counsel before making compliance decisions.Verified Jul 28, 2026
  1. Home/
  2. Florida/
  3. Florida AI Legislation (Deepfake and AI Disclosure Laws)/
  4. Compliance Checklist
In effectHB 919 (2024, enacted) + HB 757 (2025, enacted) + 2026-session items

Florida AI Legislation (Deepfake and AI Disclosure Laws): Compliance Checklist

A practical checklist of the main obligations to satisfy under this law.

Compliance checklist

Run through these items to scope your obligations under Florida AI Legislation (Deepfake and AI Disclosure Laws). Not legal advice; verify with counsel before acting.

  1. Confirm scope: does the law apply to your operations? See Who Must Comply or use the Compliance Checker.
  2. Inventory in-scope AI systems and classify them by role (developer/deployer) and decision type.
  3. Address each obligation:
    • disclosure — Include a clear and conspicuous disclaimer on any political advertisement that uses generative AI to depict a real person performing an action that did not occur, where the advertisement is intended to injure a candidate or deceive a voter. Omission is a first-degree misdemeanor.Fla. Stat. ch. 2024-126 (HB 919)
    • data handling — Do not willfully generate, solicit, promote, or possess with intent to promote an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Covered platforms must remove altered sexual depictions and known identical copies within 48 hours of a valid takedown request. Civil exposure includes $10,000 or actual damages for covered violations, plus FDUTPA penalties for takedown failures.Fla. Stat. § 836.13 (HB 757 / Brooke's Law)
  4. Adopt a federal control framework: NIST AI RMF or ISO/IEC 42001 to demonstrate due care.
  5. Document evidence of compliance for each obligation, refreshed at the cadence the law requires.
  6. Build the AG-notification path if the law requires it (Colorado, California SB 53).
  7. Set the refresh cadence — annual for most impact-assessment regimes; continuous for monitoring.

Automate AI governance with OneTrust

partner link

Manage AI inventory, risk assessments, and policy enforcement across your organization. Used by hundreds of regulated enterprises.

See OneTrust AI Governance →
More on this law
  • Full law detail
  • Who Must Comply
  • Penalties
  • Disclosure Requirements
  • Impact Assessment Requirements
  • Consumer Rights
  • Enforcement Actions
Legal disclaimer

This content is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change frequently and vary by jurisdiction. Consult qualified legal counsel before making compliance decisions. Information accuracy not guaranteed as of any specific date.

We may receive referral commissions from recommended compliance tools. Recommendations are based on product fit and not on commission size. Links marked “partner link” include a tracked redirect.