Effective soonSB 5 (2026); predecessor SB 2 (2025)
Connecticut Public Act 26-15 / SB 5 (Online Safety and AI Provisions): Compliance Checklist
A practical checklist of the main obligations to satisfy under this law.
Compliance checklist
Run through these items to scope your obligations under Connecticut Public Act 26-15 / SB 5 (Online Safety and AI Provisions). Not legal advice; verify with counsel before acting.
- Confirm scope: does the law apply to your operations? See Who Must Comply or use the Compliance Checker.
- Inventory in-scope AI systems and classify them by role (developer/deployer) and decision type.
- Address each obligation:
- transparency — On and after October 1, 2026, a subscription-based provider that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative AI system with more than 1,000,000 monthly users and public accessibility to consumers for personal use must provide the generative-AI subscription disclosure required by Public Act 26-100 Section 46 (which replaced the original Public Act 26-15 subscription provisions). The duty is enforced solely by the Attorney General as a Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) violation, with no private right of action.Public Act 26-100 § 46 (revising Public Act 26-15 / Sub. SB 5)
- disclosure — On and after October 1, 2026, an employer that conducts a layoff substantially caused or contributed to by an artificial intelligence system must provide the AI-related layoff notice required by Public Act 26-15. This is one of the earliest-effective private-sector duties in the Connecticut package and applies alongside the state's existing separation and mass-layoff notice obligations.Public Act 26-15 (Sub. SB 5, An Act Concerning Online Safety)
- governance — On and after January 1, 2027, a large frontier-model developer must establish an anonymous whistleblower reporting channel through which employees and contractors can report critical AI risks. Violations of the frontier-developer whistleblower provisions carry a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation plus injunctive and equitable remedies, distinct from the CUTPA/Attorney-General model that governs most other provisions of the Act.Public Act 26-15 (Sub. SB 5) — frontier-developer provisions
- consumer right — On and after January 1, 2027, an operator of an AI companion (a system designed to simulate sustained human-like relationships with a user) must implement the Act's chatbot safety provisions, including protections for minors. These operator duties sit within the Act's broader youth online-safety framework and are enforced by the Attorney General as CUTPA violations.Public Act 26-15 (Sub. SB 5) — AI companion provisions
- disclosure — For deployments of automated employment-related decision technology (AEDT) on or after October 1, 2027, a deployer must provide the Act's interactive disclosures and pre-decision written notice to affected individuals. The Attorney General may issue a 60-day cure notice for AEDT violations occurring through December 31, 2027, so the earliest AEDT-specific compliance work is a 2027 program task rather than a 2026 one.Public Act 26-15 (Sub. SB 5) — AEDT provisions
- Adopt a federal control framework: NIST AI RMF or ISO/IEC 42001 to demonstrate due care.
- Document evidence of compliance for each obligation, refreshed at the cadence the law requires.
- Build the AG-notification path if the law requires it (Colorado, California SB 53).
- Set the refresh cadence — annual for most impact-assessment regimes; continuous for monitoring.
We may receive referral commissions from recommended compliance tools. Recommendations are based on product fit and not on commission size. Links marked “partner link” include a tracked redirect.