AAI Compliance Atlas
FrameworksState lawsIndustriesToolsNews
GuidesMap my obligations →
AAI Compliance Atlas

Structured, continuously verified reference for US AI compliance — federal frameworks, state laws, and the obligations that connect them.

Atlas

  • Frameworks
  • State laws
  • Industries
  • By role
  • Comparisons

Tools

  • Compliance Checker
  • Penalty Calculator
  • Impact Assessment

Resources

  • Guides
  • News
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
© 2026 AI Compliance Atlas. Informational only — not legal advice. Consult qualified counsel before making compliance decisions.Verified Jun 9, 2026
  1. Home/
  2. New York City/
  3. NYC Local Law 144 (Automated Employment Decision Tools)/
  4. Penalties
In effectInt. 1894-A / Local Law 144 of 2021

NYC Local Law 144 (Automated Employment Decision Tools): Penalties

Civil penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and the structure of liability under this law.

Penalties and enforcement

Maximum penalty
$2K
per violation
Effective
January 1, 2023
Status: effective

Enforcement structure

NYC Local Law 144 (Automated Employment Decision Tools) is enforced by the New York City authority designated in the statute (typically the state Attorney General). Most U.S. state AI laws use civil enforcement with per-violation penalties; some include cure periods after notice.

For exposure scenario modeling across multiple applicable laws, use the Penalty Calculator.

Last verified: 2026-05-19

NYC Local Law 144 penalty exposure model

NYC Local Law 144 penalty exposure turns on how DCWP counts an AEDT violation: first-day violations are capped differently from later violations, daily use can compound, and missing notices can create separate counts.

How NYC Local Law 144 counts AEDT violations

Administrative Code § 20-872 sets a civil penalty of not more than $500 for a first violation and each additional violation occurring on the same day as the first violation, then $500 to $1,500 for each subsequent violation.

The same section makes each day of unlawful AEDT use a separate violation of § 20-871(a). It also treats each failure to provide a required candidate or employee notice under § 20-871(b)(1)-(3) as a separate violation.

NYC Local Law 144 penalty scenarios

A single unaudited AEDT used continuously for hiring or promotion can therefore compound by day even before counting candidate-specific notice failures. The table below models only the daily-use violation path, so it is a conservative planning floor rather than a worst-case candidate-volume model.

Notice failures can add a separate violation count for each candidate or employee who should have received the required AEDT notice, job-characteristics disclosure, or data-retention/data-source information.

DCWP enforcement and complaint path

DCWP states that employers and employment agencies may be reported for using an AEDT without the required bias audit, without posting a bias-audit summary, or without giving required notices. The agency began enforcement of the law and rule on July 5, 2023.

The law allows the corporation counsel or a designated enforcement official to bring an action or proceeding for correction of a violation, mandatory compliance, or other appropriate relief. Local Law 144 also preserves candidate and employee rights under other laws rather than replacing them.

Controls that reduce penalty exposure

The shortest path to reducing penalty exposure is evidence-first: keep the independent bias audit current, post the required summary before AEDT use, keep the summary available for at least six months after last use, and preserve a timestamped notice path at least 10 business days before use.

For vendor-managed AEDTs, employers should keep an internal file showing the distribution date, audit date, data source, selection or scoring rates, impact ratios, notice copy, and the URL where public results are posted. Those artifacts map directly to the items DCWP and the final rule identify.

Penalty exposure table

Daily-use-only model for one AEDT used without satisfying § 20-871(a); candidate-notice failures can add separate counts.

ScenarioCalculationMaximum exposure
First day of unlawful use$500 first violation$500
7 calendar days of continuous unlawful use$500 + 6 x $1,500$9,500
30 calendar days of continuous unlawful use$500 + 29 x $1,500$44,000
90 calendar days of continuous unlawful use$500 + 89 x $1,500$134,000
365 calendar days of continuous unlawful use$500 + 364 x $1,500$546,500

Primary sources

  • NYC DCWP AEDT enforcement page (retrieved 2026-05-19)
  • Local Law 144 of 2021 text, Admin. Code §§ 20-870 to 20-874 (retrieved 2026-05-19)
  • DCWP Final Rule, 6 RCNY §§ 5-300 to 5-304 (retrieved 2026-05-19)

Automate AI governance with OneTrust

partner link

Manage AI inventory, risk assessments, and policy enforcement across your organization. Used by hundreds of regulated enterprises.

See OneTrust AI Governance →
More on this law
  • Full law detail
  • Compliance Checklist
  • Who Must Comply
  • Disclosure Requirements
  • Impact Assessment Requirements
  • Consumer Rights
  • Enforcement Actions
Legal disclaimer

This content is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change frequently and vary by jurisdiction. Consult qualified legal counsel before making compliance decisions. Information accuracy not guaranteed as of any specific date.

We may receive referral commissions from recommended compliance tools. Recommendations are based on product fit and not on commission size. Links marked “partner link” include a tracked redirect.